Another marketing strategy
Use this to sell TNT? I wonder, could something like this actually work?
All human economic systems are built around one core idea: how to extract economic rent from those who produce real goods and services. That’s it. That’s the game. Always has been.
Every honest economist will tell you:
It’s impossible to make outsized, long-term profits in a truly competitive market.
You don’t become a billionaire by selling something valuable.
You become a billionaire by owning the gate, the rulebook, the licensing, the rails, or the platform that others must use to produce or exchange.
You need barriers to entry.
You need control.
You need institutional leverage.
You need legalized, automated, perpetual toll collection.
Or as Warren Buffett — that slow-talking old-racket finance ghoul — tells his investors:
“You need a moat.”
Not value.
Not invention.
Not productivity.
A structural wall that keeps others out while you skim from inside.
That’s how he explains rent-seeking to his LPs — as if it’s wisdom, not parasitism.
Let’s stop pretending.
Let’s drop the euphemisms.
All the real money is in rent.
That’s where the empires are.
That’s what every “visionary” actually builds:
A patented tollbooth
A regulatory racket
A financial product rigged with asymmetry
A platform that automates consent, skims value, and calls it “innovation”
They don’t contribute.
They capture.
Economic rent is unearned income — not from making something better, but from owning the slot others must pass through. It’s control, not creation. Power, not productivity.
So when someone tells you they’re a billionaire because they “created value” or “changed the world,” do one thing:
Look for the rent. Follow the gate. Find the moat.
That’s where the real money is. Always.
That’s the root structure beneath every ideology, every market, every legal regime.
At the foundation, there are only two roles:
Those who create value — and those who extract it.
In feudalism, extraction was violent.
Lords owned land. Serfs worked it. The surplus went upward.
The sword maintained order. The system was brutal — and honest.
In industrial capitalism, the system partially worked.
Quality of life improved. Wages rose. Workers earned closer to what they produced.
Fairness wasn’t universal, but value and reward were at least structurally connected.
Then came the current phase: post-industrial, digitized, abstracted, and automated.
Now, the tool of extraction is no longer force.
It’s asymmetric information.
In a world of fully informed, voluntary exchange, rent extraction is impossible.
But that’s not the world we live in. This system thrives on opacity — on control through infrastructure, permission, data, and compliance.
Extraction is frictionless. Invisible. Skinned in UX.
This is no longer capitalism.
It’s algorithmic feudalism.
Extraction is done by platforms.
Power lives in code.
Compliance is enforced by logic gates, not laws.
The new lords don’t wear crowns.
They run corporations, venture funds, foundations, and APIs.
Wealth today isn’t earned by labor or invention.
It’s captured by inserting yourself between someone’s effort and someone else’s need.
That’s rent.
Not just in housing. In everything.
If you own the protocol, the store, the supply chain, the patent, or the data layer, you don’t have to produce anything — you charge others for access.
This is how every billionaire operates.
None scaled their labor. None created proportional value.
They captured a chokepoint, automated the rules, and let the system skim by default.
Examples?
Elon Musk didn’t invent EVs or rockets.
He bought into companies, licensed others’ tech, and claimed ownership over processes he didn’t create.
His skill was extracting credit, capturing subsidy, crushing labor, and building myth.
Jeff Bezos didn’t invent e-commerce or logistics.
He centralized transactions, subsidized dominance, then turned every seller into a tenant.
Sell on Amazon? Pay a cut. Want visibility? Pay again.
Compete too well? Amazon copies you and buries your product.
Bill Gates built Microsoft on closed code, restrictive licenses, and bundling.
He used the legal system to crush open systems.
Then he deployed a fraction of his wealth into the Gates Foundation — not to dismantle the system, but to launder his legacy.
Peter Thiel is the most honest.
He says competition is for losers.
He funds monopolies, surveillance, defense tech — and calls it “liberty.”
He critiques stagnation while investing in its enforcement.
None of them are anomalies.
They are the ideal product of a system that rewards leverage, not value.
Billionaires aren’t capitalists.
They’re not builders.
They’re sovereigns without nations — kings of code, law, and data.
And the rest of us?
We’re the ones who work. Who make. Who teach, care, drive, build, fix, write, heal, grow.
We produce the real value.
But we do it inside systems we don’t own, under contracts we didn’t write, for platforms we don’t control.
We click “accept” on terms we never read.
We work under metrics we didn’t choose.
We produce content that someone else monetizes.
We build infrastructure that someone else patents.
Then they tell us it’s our fault.
That we didn’t brand hard enough.
That we didn’t hustle right.
That if we’d just bought the right course, we’d be rich too.
But the game is rigged.
It doesn’t reward value.
It rewards position.
It rewards owning the fence, not growing the crop.
So what do you do?
You don’t protest.
You don’t demand.
You don’t beg.
You disconnect.
You stop building for those who extract from you.
You stop contributing to platforms that capture all upside.
You stop handing leverage to people who didn’t earn it.
You build systems they can’t own.
You make the knowledge open.
You make the code public.
You make the value shared.
You tie reward to contribution — not position, not license, not inherited control.
This isn’t theory.
This isn’t revolution.
This is strategic survival.
There are only two systems:
Ones you control.
And ones that control you.
The Ukraine war is not a war of liberation.
It’s not a war of ideology.
It’s not even a war of national defense in the traditional sense.
It’s a strategic economic conflict—cloaked in flags, soaked in blood, and orchestrated by competing rent-seeking empires.
The surface story:
Russia invades Ukraine on February 24, 2022, claiming it’s about protecting Russian speakers, resisting NATO expansion, and defending sovereignty.
Ukraine fights back, claiming its right to self-determination, national survival, and democratic alignment with the West.
The West sends money, weapons, media support, and debt.
Millions flee. Cities are flattened. Hundreds of thousands die.
That’s the visible part. That’s what gets televised.
The real story:
Ukraine sits between two massive rent machines:
One is Russia: a cronyist energy empire built on controlling pipelines, gas flows, trade corridors, and border zones.
The other is the West: a financial-legal empire built on integrating emerging markets into its platform economy, debt systems, and military alignment structure.
Neither side gives a fuck about ordinary Ukrainians.
They care about:
Who controls the infrastructure
Who gets to write the contracts
Who owns the reconstruction
Who sets the monetary rails
Who profits from grain, gas, transit, and land
The war isn’t about NATO per se.
It’s about whether Ukraine becomes a rentable Western client state or remains a Russian economic buffer zone.
Why Russia invaded:
Not because it was under attack.
Not because Ukraine was going to join NATO tomorrow.
But because Russia saw its rent streams under threat: gas pipelines, transit leverage, port access, military deterrence, cultural compliance.
So it lashed out — not strategically, but emotionally and catastrophically.
Why the West got involved:
Not out of compassion.
Not out of liberal values.
But because Ukraine was an unintegrated market with rich resources, underdeveloped financial systems, and massive debt potential.
If Ukraine can be “rescued,” it can be owned — with privatization, Western investment, and postwar development loans that last a generation.
The U.S. and Europe are not building democracy.
They’re installing extractive infrastructure.
What it is:
A rent war.
Disguised as a national conflict.
Executed through bodies.
Profited from at scale.
Russia seeks to retain its decaying rent pipeline.
The West seeks to install a new one.
Ukraine is the battleground — and the prize.
That’s the war.
Absolutely. Here’s your entire position, summarized formally, clean and sharp:
⚖️
Thesis: Theology Has No Real-World Use Value and Functions as Institutionalized Rent Seeking
1.
Definition of Use Value
Use value is defined as the capacity of a field or practice to produce tangible, measurable, and functional benefits that directly improve human well-being, material conditions, or cognitive capability.
2.
Comparison to Productive Disciplines
Physics: yields spaceflight, electricity, telecommunications.
Biology: produces vaccines, gene therapy, modern medicine.
Chemistry: gives us synthetic materials, drugs, clean energy tech.
Economics: improved governance, market design, efficiency.
Psychology: enables therapy, cognitive tools, behavioral interventions.
Each of these disciplines has demonstrable, verifiable outcomes that have materially advanced human life.
3.
Theology’s Track Record
Over 2,000+ years, theology has produced:
No testable knowledge
No innovations
No solutions to material or mental problems
No models that explain or predict reality
No utility for non-believers or skeptics
Its output is entirely internal: commentary on texts, defense of dogma, and the maintenance of metaphysical claims that are not falsifiable or functionally applicable.
4.
Rent-Seeking Structure
Theological institutions:
Extract wealth via donations, tithes, and public subsidies
Operate tax-free in most jurisdictions
Accumulate land, capital, and political influence without producing equivalent value
Historically suppressed productive inquiry, from science to philosophy
This makes theology, in economic terms, a parasitic structure: extracting resources without creating value.
5.
Counterarguments Rejected
“It brings meaning” → Meaning exists without supernatural claims; philosophy and psychology suffice.
“It supports charity” → Charity is universal; atheists, secular orgs, and governments do the same or more.
“It comforts people” → Comfort based on false claims ≠ productive value. Drugs can do that too.
🧨
Conclusion
Theology offers no direct, functional benefit to human life.
It has historically obstructed progress, extracted wealth from productive populations, and institutionalized itself through tax exemptions and legal privileges.
It is not merely unproductive—it is formally a rent-seeking enterprise, cloaked in metaphysics.
There it is. Full thesis, no fluff.